Sustainable noise protection

100 % ecologically minded

Quick assembly

Stable, flexible, economical

Low-maintenance systems

Without constant irrigation

Innovative solutions

Can also be combined with photovoltaics

When deadlines are tight, preparation is key. In projects around Augsburg, clear criteria are helpful so that awarding and project development do not run counter to each other. You can find current mobile noise barriers on an ongoing basis. For local authorities, what counts above all is the verifiability of documents, while property developers pay attention to usability and interfaces in the neighborhood. Late clarifications lead to rescheduling, supplements and additional rounds that put pressure on deadlines and budgets. We provide a comprehensible decision-making logic so that requirements, variants and interfaces remain in line. We combine planning and consulting with a view to statics, material verification and the subsequent logic for maintenance or servicing. A clear list of criteria stabilizes the next steps without making things unnecessarily complicated. For local authorities, it is important that requirements are described in a verifiable manner and that decisions can be explained to the administration and committees. For developers, it is important that land use, outdoor spaces and development are not blocked by late changes. Late clarifications lead to rescheduling, supplements and additional rounds of coordination, which put a strain on the budget and deadline. A brief preliminary review separates the must-haves from the options and speeds up the comparison of variants. Depending on the project, a range is often more helpful than fictitious accuracy when plans are still in flux.

Your advantages at a glance.
  • Up to 12 m height
  • Without deep foundation
  • Quick assembly
  • Economic implementation
  • Greenable
  • Flexible lines
  • Suitable for tight spaces
  • Durable and robust

Which noise barrier fits in Augsburg

The right solution is determined by space requirements, environmental impact and construction sequence. When comparing variants, space requirements, appearance, robustness, construction phase and existing buildings quickly lead to different priorities. We structure the choice of system in such a way that the direction taken by the project team remains justifiable and detailed planning does not come to nothing. References are a pragmatic option, especially in the construction phase. We combine planning and consulting with a view to statics, material verification and the subsequent logic for maintenance or servicing. In the case of existing systems, refurbishment can be economical if the beams, spacing and depth of intervention allow further use. Depending on the project, the most robust solution is often the one that generates the least amount of extra work during operation. For local authorities, it is important that requirements are described in a verifiable manner and that decisions can be explained to the administration and committees. For developers, it is important that land use, outdoor spaces and development are not blocked by late changes. Late clarifications lead to rescheduling, supplements and additional rounds of coordination, which put a strain on the budget and deadline. A brief preliminary review separates the must-haves from the options and speeds up the comparison of variants. Depending on the project, a range is often more helpful than fictitious accuracy when planning statuses are still in flux. In the Bavarian context, coordination and documentation often run parallel to planning, which is why a clean structure pays off in particular.

Gallery:

Augsburg Coordination, documents and implementation

In demanding projects, the early framework counts more than late corrections. A stable process combines preliminary review, document status, interface clarification and the organization of assembly windows. We keep responsibilities and handovers clear so that open points do not end up on the construction site. For ecologically oriented projects, we consider systems such as the climate wall R3 if a green wall logic fits into the comparison of variants. Depending on the location, contact can also be useful. A calm process with clear handovers makes deadlines more resilient and reduces friction. For local authorities, it is important that requirements are described in a verifiable manner and that decisions can be explained to the administration and committees. For developers, it is important that land use, outdoor spaces and development are not blocked by late changes. Late clarifications lead to rescheduling, supplements and additional rounds of coordination, which put a strain on the budget and deadline. A brief preliminary review separates the must-haves from the options and speeds up the comparison of variants. Depending on the project, a range is often more helpful than fictitious accuracy when planning statuses are still in flux. In the Bavarian context, coordination and documentation often run parallel to planning, which is why a clear structure pays off in particular. Robust detail points and clear transitions reduce the need for special solutions later on and make operation easier.

FAQs:

The effect is documented by means of an acoustic calculation (actual/forecast case, comparison of variants). We derive the height, length and position from this and document the expected reduction in noise levels in a comprehensible manner. You will receive a short decision document.

Construction in sections often makes sense. We define short closure windows, logistical access routes and communication modules for residents – so the load remains plannable.

We inspect existing pipelines, coordinate with utilities and recommend spot soundings. We define requirements for the foundation (e.g. strip foundation, piles) and calculate risk buffers transparently.

Section-by-section solutions are often possible once hotspots have been identified. We check where sections are sufficient and where gaps would greatly reduce the effect. We will clarify this in the site appointment.

The “wall effect” can be reduced through targeted height staggering, transparent elements or greenery. We check this in the design and coordinate variants with urban design and residents.

Whether the local authority, state/federal government, Autobahn GmbH or DB is responsible depends on the road/railway and section. We identify the right sponsor, coordinate interfaces and define who commissions which services.

Funding or co-financing options may be available depending on the sponsor and program. We check starting points (e.g. noise reduction/infrastructure programs) and prepare the necessary documents.

Smooth, coated surfaces and modular systems with interchangeable elements are usually robust. We select the solution according to location risk and budget.

Easements or agreements are often necessary for private areas. We provide the technical basis (site plan/requirements) and support the municipality in preparing the coordination with owners. We will clarify this in the site appointment.

Early information with visualizations, an on-site appointment and a short feedback phase have proven their worth. This allows sensitive points (appearance, transparency, height) to be taken into account at an early stage.