Sustainable noise protection

100 % ecologically minded

Quick assembly

Stable, flexible, economical

Low-maintenance systems

Without constant irrigation

Innovative solutions

Can also be combined with photovoltaics

Awarding requires clarity, project development requires usability and speed. In projects around Weiden in der Oberpfalz, clear criteria are helpful so that awarding and project development do not run counter to each other. You will find current climate change R3 on an ongoing basis. Developers look first at areas and construction progress, local authorities at awarding and acceptance; both are brought together in the process. Late clarifications lead to rescheduling, supplements and additional rounds that put pressure on deadlines and budgets. We provide a comprehensible decision-making logic so that requirements, variants and interfaces remain in line. In the case of existing systems, refurbishment can be cost-effective if the beams, distances and depth of intervention allow further use. A preliminary check provides clarity without overburdening the planning status. For local authorities, it is important that requirements are described in a verifiable manner and that decisions can be explained to the administration and committees. For developers, it is important that land use, outdoor spaces and development are not blocked by late changes. Late clarifications lead to rescheduling, supplements and additional rounds of coordination, which put a strain on the budget and deadline. A brief preliminary review separates the must-haves from the options and speeds up the comparison of variants. Depending on the project, a range is often more helpful than fictitious accuracy when plans are still in flux.

Your advantages at a glance.
  • Up to 12 m height
  • Without deep foundation
  • Quick assembly
  • Economic implementation
  • Greenable
  • Flexible lines
  • Suitable for tight spaces
  • Durable and robust

Weiden in der Oberpfalz Noise barriers for new and existing buildings

A clean process combines document status, interfaces and installation windows. When comparing variants, space requirements, appearance, robustness, construction phase and inventory quickly lead to different priorities. We structure the choice of system in such a way that the direction taken by the project team remains justifiable and detailed planning does not come to nothing. Companies are a pragmatic option, especially in the construction phase. If dual use seems sensible, we examine the combination of noise protection and photovoltaics as an option, depending on the project requirements. For ecologically oriented projects, we consider systems such as the Klimawand R3 if a green wall logic fits into the comparison of variants. A resilient system direction is created when application limits and maintenance ideas are also considered. For local authorities, it is important that requirements are described in a verifiable manner and that decisions in administration and committees remain explainable. For developers, it is important that land use, outdoor spaces and development are not blocked by late changes. Late clarifications lead to rescheduling, supplements and additional rounds of coordination, which put a strain on the budget and deadline. A brief preliminary review separates the must-haves from the options and speeds up the comparison of variants. Depending on the project, a range is often more helpful than fictitious accuracy when planning statuses are still in flux. In the Bavarian context, coordination and documentation often run parallel to planning, which is why a clean structure pays off in particular.

Gallery:

Noise protection projects in Weiden in der Oberpfalz from preliminary inspection to handover

A clear framework of criteria makes decisions comprehensible and sustainable. A stable process combines preliminary review, document status, interface clarification and the organization of the assembly windows. We keep responsibilities and handovers clear so that unresolved issues do not end up on the construction site. For ecologically oriented projects, we consider systems such as the climate wall R3 if a green wall logic fits into the comparison of variants. Depending on the location, contact can also be useful. Structured coordination of the interfaces noticeably reduces subsequent effort. For local authorities, it is important that requirements are described in a verifiable manner and that decisions in administration and committees remain explainable. For developers, it is important that land use, outdoor spaces and development are not blocked by late changes. Late clarifications lead to rescheduling, supplements and additional rounds of coordination, which put a strain on the budget and deadline. A brief preliminary review separates the must-haves from the options and speeds up the comparison of variants. Depending on the project, a range is often more helpful than fictitious accuracy when planning statuses are still in flux. In the Bavarian context, coordination and documentation often run parallel to planning, which is why a clear structure pays off in particular. Robust detail points and clear transitions reduce later special solutions and facilitate operation. A calm, comprehensible process reduces conflicts between the surroundings, use and construction process.

FAQs:

The responsibility depends on the traffic route (municipal road, state/federal road, highway or railroad line). We clarify who is responsible for construction, who bears the costs and the approval channels in a short responsibility check and summarize this in a matrix.

We draw up a clear specification of services including quantity estimates, quality requirements (material, coating, sound insulation values) and interfaces (pipes, traffic safety). On request, we can assist with bidder questions and evaluation.

Depending on the impact, replacement planting or compensatory measures may be necessary. We record affected areas and integrate measures into cost and schedule planning.

Funding or co-financing options may be available depending on the sponsor and program. We check starting points (e.g. noise reduction/infrastructure programs) and prepare the necessary documents.

An acoustic calculation is usually required for dimensioning. Among other things, traffic data (DTV/proportions), speed, topography and affected immission receivers are required. We coordinate the data collection and provide a clear list of requirements. We will clarify this in the site appointment.

We check parcels of land/property, necessary verges, access for construction and maintenance as well as any easements. This results in an area plan including a list of measures (purchase, usage agreement, route adjustment). We will clarify this in the site appointment.

Early information with visualizations, an on-site appointment and a short feedback phase have proven their worth. This allows sensitive points (appearance, transparency, height) to be taken into account at an early stage.

Depending on the location and sponsor, a building permit may be sufficient or a planning procedure may be necessary (e.g. in the context of roads or railroads). We examine the specific case, name the required documents and draw up a realistic schedule. You will receive a short decision document.

The “wall effect” can be reduced through targeted height staggering, transparent elements or greenery. We check this in the design and coordinate variants with urban design and residents.

The decisive factors are distance to the source, height, line of sight between the source and the place of immission and reflections. We optimize the geometry so that the effect is high and the construction costs remain within reasonable limits. You will receive a short decision document.